Stephanie (mirroredsakura) wrote,
Stephanie
mirroredsakura

  • Mood:
  • Music:

This is getting ridiculous

So I just realized my header image for dearestophelia's profile was removed by Imageshack for being pornographic in nature. What dire straits have we come to when someone's charcoal sketch of a woman with a beatific face floating in water with one breast bared is considered pornographic and inappropriate?

This has been happening to a whole load of pictures I've had up, but this really shocked me. I went back to the guy's site that I originally borrowed the image from, and the closest I could find now is this where a dress has been painted on to cover both breasts.

Nudity is one of those things. You're either bothered by it or not. But I can't help but think this is taking things entirely too far. Way to go Imageshack. Back to my long ongoing search for a less bigoted image hosting provider.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic
  • 39 comments
Previous
← Ctrl ← Alt
Next
Ctrl → Alt →
Previous
← Ctrl ← Alt
Next
Ctrl → Alt →